Anatomy of a Gamma Week / Part 4
FLOW DETECTION THURSDAY · AUG 13, 2026 7 MIN READ

726 Broke, 730 Printed — and the Zeros Were the Worst Way to Own It

The level was called on Monday. It printed on Thursday at 9:55 AM ET. Between those two moments the map got measurably weaker, the trigger fired exactly where it was said it would, and the biggest lesson of the week turned out to be about which instrument you use — not about being right.

Thursday’s pre-open: thinner cushion, same walls 8:21 AM ET · change vs Aug 12
Net GEX
+$3.8B
-$1.8B (-32.1%)
Put GEX
-$11.2B
-$1.3B (13.1% more negative)
Call wall
$730
+7.03 above spot · unchanged all week
Zero gamma
$717.65
+$1.33 · only $5.32 below spot
cushion to the flip · 0–3% of spot

Spot $722.97 (-$0.23). Call GEX $14.9B (-3.9%), total GEX $26.1B (+2.4%). Gross positioning kept growing while the net cushion shrank. Source: QQQ Gamma & Short-Volatility pre-open brief, transcribed from the InsiderFinance and Unusual Whales panels captured that morning. Values the panels did not expose are omitted rather than estimated.

Positive gamma, thinner cushion

Net gamma exposure (GEX) fell $1.8B to +$3.8B — a 32.1% drop in a session — while put GEX became $1.3B more negative at -$11.2B. Call GEX slipped 3.9% to $14.9B, and total GEX still grew 2.4% to $26.1B. So gross positioning kept building while the net dampening capacity shrank by a third.

Meanwhile the gamma flip level rose again, to $717.65, leaving spot only $5.32 above it. The regime was still positive. It was one bad hour from not being.

The map, and the trigger inside it

The decision map: upside ladder, downside cluster Major gamma walls · Aug 13 pre-open · spot $722.97
The decision map: upside ladder, downside cluster Major gamma walls · Aug 13 pre-open · spot $722.97. 740: +$624M; 735: +$753M; 732: +$182M; 730: +$1.11B; 725: +$117.7M; 720: -$210M; 718: -$136M; 716: -$95.8M; 715: -$365M; 710: -$212M. 740: +$624M — upper wall 740 735: +$753M — secondary resistance 735 +$753M 732: +$182M 732 730: +$1.11B — dominant magnet 730 +$1.11B 725: +$117.7M — first confirmation (0DTE) 725 720: -$210M — first downside warning 720 718: -$136M 718 716: -$95.8M — zero-gamma transition 716 715: -$365M — largest nearby downside wall 715 -$365M 710: -$212M — acceleration node 710 $500M$1B-$200M SPOT 722.97 FLIP 717.65 gamma
Positive / call-side gamma (bar grows right)Negative / put-side gamma (bar grows left)

Live wall amounts from the supplied Unusual Whales panels. The expiry heatmap reports net GEX by expiry and does not expose a verified pure call/put split at every strike, so put-side bars are labelled put-side rather than pure put gamma. Source: QQQ Gamma & Short-Volatility pre-open brief, transcribed from the InsiderFinance and Unusual Whales panels captured that morning. Values the panels did not expose are omitted rather than estimated.

Above spot: a dense ladder at $725, then the dominant $730 wall at +$1.11B, then $735 at +$753M and $740 at +$624M. Below spot: negative gamma growing through $720 (-$210M) and $718 (-$136M) into the real cluster at $715 (-$365M), with $710 (-$212M) behind it. A clean decision map — hold $720-$723 and the market can grind toward $725 and $730; lose $717.65 and downside responsiveness increases.

"Slightly more put gamma this morning, I expect chop around 720s — Would only look to take a zero if 726 is broken we would see 730 or 718—>715"— Jim Claxton, 8:28 AM ET, Aug 13

That is a conditional with a named trigger and both branches specified before the open. It is the most useful sentence of the week, and it is worth noticing that it did not predict $730 — it said what would have to happen first.

Where the risk actually lived

The same two poles, split by expiration Net GEX at $730 and $715 · 0DTE vs Aug 14 vs Aug 21
The same two poles, split by expiration Net GEX at $730 and $715 · 0DTE vs Aug 14 vs Aug 21. 730 · 0DTE: +$254.1M; 730 · Aug 14: +$317.3M; 730 · Aug 21: +$286.7M; 715 · 0DTE: -$54.8M; 715 · Aug 14: -$245.5M; 715 · Aug 21: -$49.0M. 730 · 0DTE: +$254.1M 730 · 0DTE +$254.1M 730 · Aug 14: +$317.3M 730 · Aug 14 +$317.3M 730 · Aug 21: +$286.7M 730 · Aug 21 +$286.7M 715 · 0DTE: -$54.8M 715 · 0DTE 715 · Aug 14: -$245.5M — concentrated downside risk 715 · Aug 14 -$245.5M 715 · Aug 21: -$49.0M 715 · Aug 21 $200M-$200M net GEX
Positive / call-side gamma (bar grows right)Negative / put-side gamma (bar grows left)

The upside structure at $730 is consistent across all three expirations — that is what a structural wall looks like. The downside risk at $715 is concentrated almost entirely in the Aug 14 expiry, which happens to be the expiry the week’s put spread was sold in. Source: QQQ Gamma & Short-Volatility pre-open brief, transcribed from the InsiderFinance and Unusual Whales panels captured that morning. Values the panels did not expose are omitted rather than estimated.

Splitting the two poles by expiration shows something the headline numbers hide. At $730 the positive structure is spread evenly across 0DTE, Aug 14 and Aug 21 — that is what makes it structural rather than a one-day artifact. At $715, the negative gamma is concentrated in Aug 14: -$245.5M against -$54.8M in 0DTE and -$49.0M in Aug 21.

Aug 14 was the expiry the week’s put spread was sold in. That is not a reason the trade was wrong — the short strike was $715 and price was 8 points above it — but it is a reason to know exactly where a break would have hurt most, and it is visible in the data before it matters.

The move

09:36726 broken — should see 730 now
09:36Reduced spread down to 30cc — 76%
09:36did 50 of the 730s for .30 — closed at .88
09:36closed all spreads cc — 85% profit — not worth assignment risk holding last 20
09:55There she goes… 730

The 9:55 print: open $729.63, high $730.02, low $729.55, close $730.00, +0.37 (+0.05%) on 111,369 shares. The call wall that had been sitting at $730 since Monday morning, tagged.

The morning had also set the management rule for the slow book: let the large-cap strangle keep producing, roll if the topside gets pressured. And another 25% of profits came off the sold put spread, with a stated plan to place the next one during the next balanced table.

What was taken versus what the map implied

Here is the uncomfortable arithmetic, stated the way it was actually stated. A 1,000-contract position in those $730 calls, bought at .30 and sold at $3, would have been $270K. The $729/$730 call spread the day before was roughly an 8:1 ratio — $100K risked into $800K.

Those are hindsight numbers at prices nobody was obliged to fill, in sizes nobody had on. They are not results, and treating them as a benchmark is how a good week turns into a bad habit. What was real: 50 lots of the $730s from .30 to .88, the spread reduced at 76% and closed at 85%, and the last 20 lots let go rather than carried into assignment risk.

The honest reading is not "we left $270K on the table." It is that the desk was on the right side of a level for four consecutive sessions and expressed it in small, fast instruments that required being at the desk at the right minute. The instrument that did not require that — the put spread — is the one that paid, twice, on a schedule.

The takeaway

Frequently asked

What happened when QQQ reached $730 on Aug 13, 2026?

Price tagged the level at 9:55 AM ET, printing a 1-minute bar with an open of $729.63, a high of $730.02, a low of $729.55 and a close of $730.00 on 111,369 shares. $726 had broken about twenty minutes earlier, which was the stated trigger for expecting the move.

Why did net GEX fall on the day the call wall printed?

Net GEX dropped $1.8B (-32.1%) to +$3.8B while put GEX became $1.3B more negative. The dampening cushion thinned into the move — positive gamma was still intact, but with materially less capacity than the prior session, and the zero-gamma line had risen to within $5.32 of spot.

What did the desk actually capture on the move to $730?

The put spread was reduced to 30cc for 76% and then closed entirely at about 85% of maximum profit, with the last 20 lots let go rather than held into assignment risk. A 50-lot of the $730 calls was bought at .30 and closed at .88. The larger hypothetical fills discussed afterwards were hindsight arithmetic, not positions.

The rest of the week

Anatomy of a Gamma Week — all four parts, plus the week seen whole.

← PART 3

CPI Day: Positive Gamma Is Not a Hedge